To
Sh. A.N.Nanda,
The
Secretary (Post)
Department
of Post
Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg
New Delhi-100001
No. CHQ/POA/1-51/2017-18 Dated 18.02.2019
Subject:
Draft Seniority list of P.S.Group ‘B’ officers as on 1.04.2016 – reg.
Ref : Directorate
memo No. 9-02/2019-SPG-II dated 24th January 2019
Respected
Sir,
Postal officer Association expresses its sincere
gratitude to the staff of SPB-II Division of Directorate for issue of draft
seniority list of P.S.Group ‘B’ officers corrected up-to 1.04.2016. At the same
time it is apprised that the seniority list is full of ambiguities that needs
rectification by taking the following into consideration before issue of the
final draft.
Most of the members of this Association particularly
senior officer promoted against seniority quota and on the verge of retirement
has noticed that above seniority lists has not been prepared correctly as their
interest and rights for promotion to JTS have been completely ignored. No care
has been bestowed while fixing the seniority as per given quota in the
available sanctioned strength of 866 posts in PS Group “B” cadre. As per already
settled position, 649 Group ‘B’ posts against 75% quota have been earmarked for
selection on the basis of seniority cum fitness, 165 posts against 19% quota for
LDCE from IP line officials and 6% i.e. 52 posts through LDCE for General Line
officials. For all these three quotas separate post based rosters have been
prepared by the department clearly marking the total vacancy earmarked for each
quota without any dispute. This fact has been completely ignored affecting the
right of senior officers.
It is also brought to your kind notice that when 165
(IP line) + 52(General line) = 217 posts alone are reserved under the 19% and
6% quota for promotion through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination
from a particular line how about 220 junior most officers promoted through LDCE
can be adjusted in the so called new seniority list ignoring the right of
officers promoted through seniority cum fitness. This is despite the fact that
more than 100 officers promoted through LDCE of 25% quota roster are already
finding place in the seniority list. Apparently post based roster has not been
consulted while calculated vacancies and now the present seniority list will
further mar the promotion of officers promoted through seniority cum fitness. This
shows that there was something grossly wrong with the stand taken by the department
to adjust such promote at the cost of seniors waiting their turn in JTS even
after rendering 31 years of service in IP line.
Furthermore supplementary DPC for the left out 23
vacancies for the vacancy year 2011-12 was not convened that also disturb the seniority
of officers promoted against 75% quota meant for seniority-cum-fitness
promotions of the respective year. As such 23 IPs of 1988 batch should be
placed above serial number 225 of seniority list. Moreover name of
some the officers selection of those was kept in sealed cover and now promoted
in respective vacancy year is missing in the seniority list. Name of officers
listed at serial number 228 to 240 needs to be discarded being double entry. In
the remarks column, the method of selection whether it seniority cum fitness or
LDCE or GL has not been mentioned to check the inter-se-seniority.
It is therefore requested to revise the seniority list
by settling the above ambiguity so that no one feels discriminated.
The Association solicits your lawful support and
action.
Yours sincerely,
(R.N.Yadav)
General Secretary
Postal Officer
Association
No comments:
Post a Comment